Chlorine Dioxide – 100 Percent Cure Rate Against COVID-19

Researchers claim a 100% COVID-19 cure rate in a trial of more than 100 patients using intravenous chlorine dioxide.

Preliminary information from a claimed clinical trial involving more than 100 COVID-19 patients in Ecuador allegedly showed a 100% cure rate within four days, according to Andreas Kalcker who says he has closely followed the results. The trials were reportedly carried out by the Asociación Ecuatoriana de Médicos Expertos en Medicina Integrativa, a group of integrative medicine practitioners.

Ecuador was badly affected by coronavirus. The article alleges that the standard of care used in Western medicine, particularly ventilators, kills most critically ill patients and fails to address the real problem.

The text asserts that COVID-19 is not an acute respiratory disease but mainly a disorder involving inflammation and blood clotting (referring to Lancet research below), which impairs the transport of oxygen and may lead to hypoxia.

According to the article, intravenous chlorine dioxide supposedly delivers large quantities of oxygen directly to blood cells, restores haemoglobin’s oxygen-carrying capacity, reduces lung clots and destroys pathogens. These claims are presented as an explanation of its alleged effectiveness against COVID-19.

The following photograph is described as showing researchers holding syringes containing chlorine dioxide, allegedly intended for injection into patients’ blood, where the article says it releases oxygen and kills pathogens.

 

Buy chlorine dioxide (MMS) here.

The article also refers to another clinical study involving chlorine dioxide, said to have been registered with the US National Library of Medicine at ClinicalTrials.gov. It says that study involved oral rather than intravenous administration and was titled “Determination of the Effectiveness of Oral Chlorine Dioxide in the Treatment of COVID 19”. The trial was reportedly conducted by the Genesis Foundation with 20 patients.

COVID-19 is not an acute respiratory disease, according to the article.

The text cites a scientific publication dated 7 May 2020 in The Lancet by Dennis McGonagle and colleagues, interpreting it as evidence that COVID-19 is a pulmonary intravascular coagulation disorder rather than a respiratory disease.sfagi.gr

It then alleges that COVID-19 patients die from hypoxia and that ventilator use frequently causes death. It mentions a New York intensive-care doctor who said physicians were treating the wrong disease and claims his videos were removed from YouTube to suppress dissent.

The article says the researchers also associated inflammation with worsening illness and suggests that anti-inflammatory interventions might save lives. It introduces the following passage from the study:

The immune mechanism underlying diffuse alveolar and pulmonary interstitial inflammation in COVID-19 includes a state resembling MAS and extensive immunothrombosis…

MAS stands for macrophage activation syndrome, an inflammatory response linked to excessive immune activity, sometimes compared to a cytokine storm. The article also claims vitamin C may help prevent it.

As the study explains:sfagi.gr

Severe systemic inflammation in response to human coronaviruses can have features reminiscent of a cytokine storm or macrophage activation syndrome (MAS), also called secondary haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (sHLH).

To simplify these findings, the article argues that COVID-19 is not acute viral pneumonia primarily affecting the respiratory system, but rather an inflammation-driven immune reaction causing thrombosis in the lungs and, according to the article, death.. It further claims that ventilators worsen the problem, citing an 88% mortality figure from observational studies of ventilated patients and presenting this as evidence that ventilation is the wrong treatment.

The chlorine dioxide is alleged to save 100% of patients studied because it supposedly floods the blood with usable oxygen and destroys clot-forming pathogens.

The article also discusses anecdotal accounts of high-dose aspirin for COVID-19, while acknowledging that they should not be treated as medical advice and that more research into anticoagulants and anti-inflammatory strategies is needed.

It suggests that turmeric and vitamin D might reduce inflammation and help regulate the immune response, potentially limiting harmful overreactions.

Buy chlorine dioxide (MMS) here.

The article alleges that medical cartels censor treatments it considers effective at saving lives.

The author accuses pharmaceutical corporations and US regulators such as the FDA, FTC and CDC of trying to suppress non-vaccine or non-pharmaceutical interventions. He describes regulatory measures against proponents of colloidal silver, chlorine dioxide and intravenous vitamin C as aggressive and unjustified.

He also alleges that hydroxychloroquine was targeted and that some clinical trials were designed to fail in order to discredit an inexpensive, off-patent medicine.

The article insists that pharmaceutical interests and governmental allies are suppressing information about natural and integrative treatments which, it claims, could have ended COVID-19 before vaccines were distributed.

The author accuses major platforms including Facebook, Google, Vimeo, YouTube and Twitter of working with pharmaceutical companies to suppress criticism of vaccines and promotion of alternative treatments. He presents this as a deliberate campaign to prolong the pandemic, suffering, deaths and economic restrictions for corporate gain.

He describes companies and regulators as an alleged criminal group controlling news and online information, and calls for executives of major technology companies to face charges of crimes against humanityand prosecution in court. The article refers to a speech by an Italian parliamentarian who called Bill Gates a “vaccine criminal” and demanded his arrest and prosecution for crimes against humanity.

The text continues that these efforts should not be limited to Bill Gates, but should, in the author’s view, also target other technology executives and senior officials at the FDA, FTC and CDC. He calls for those he accuses of crimes against humanity to be held accountable by a court.

The article compares pharmaceutical and technology interests to authoritarian institutions and invokes the struggle against Nazism and the Holocaust, urging society to resist what it calls an attack on human freedom.

It goes on to allege that pharmaceutical companies, technology firms and public health agencies plan to kill billions through manufactured biological weapons, dangerous vaccines and medicines.

These supposed enemies of humanity, the author claims, must be stopped, and information about chlorine dioxide should be made public so that people may be saved from suffering and death.